A 2019 graduate on what the assessment course prepared her for, and what it did not.
A 2019 graduate of the aquaculture and fisheries program now works as a fishery management analyst for a state agency, and returned to campus in February to talk to current students about what the work is actually like.
Her account of the technical side was reassuring. The stock assessment course prepared her directly: she runs assessments, reviews others, and says the experience of working with real data with its defects intact was the single most transferable thing in the degree.
Her account of the rest was less comfortable, and deliberately so.
"Nobody tells you that the hardest hour is after the number is finished," she said. "You have an estimate with an honest uncertainty range, and you are in a room with people whose income depends on which end of that range gets used. Both sides can read your confidence interval. Both sides have selected the end that suits them. And you have to keep being the person who says what the analysis supports."
She credited the co-taught fisheries policy course with being the closest preparation available, and suggested it should be required rather than recommended for anyone heading toward agency work.
Miriam Frost, who taught her, agreed on the substance and noted the limit. "We can teach the assessment. We can teach the governance. The part where you have to hold a position in front of people you will see again next year is a thing you learn by doing it."
Students asked mostly about how to get the first job. The answer was that assessment skills are scarce and that being able to demonstrate one you had run yourself was worth more than any other line on the application.